|
|
Post by blinkfan on Feb 24, 2007 17:02:23 GMT -5
Words cannot express how excited I am for this film. My want to see this film is so much that, I am actually now obsessed with the actual number 23. The Number 23 |
|
sirgallahad2
Boomstick Coordinator
RUN!! Get to de CHOPPA!!!!!
Posts: 280
|
Post by sirgallahad2 on Feb 25, 2007 10:49:51 GMT -5
try this one on for size:
the number 23: 2 divided by 3 equals .666 the mark of the beast
september 11th, 2001
09 11 2001
9+11= 20
2+0+0+1=3
20+3= 23
bum bum BUM!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Al on Feb 25, 2007 13:49:06 GMT -5
That's actually the stuff that turned me off of this film. I was all psyched to see it, then the marketing machine kicked into overdrive about three weeks ago and I started getting the endless comericals on tv, which I expected, but also radio ads and emails all about the mysteries of the number 23 and how cryptic and phophetic it is . I feel so oversaturated that I've become totally ambivalent and have no longer have any intention of checking it out. Thanks New Line!
|
|
|
|
Post by DarthShady on Feb 25, 2007 16:23:21 GMT -5
I am pretty excitexd for this. It looks pretty good, but mostly I want to see Jim Carrey in a scary, non-comedic role.
|
|
|
|
Post by sarahbot on Feb 25, 2007 20:01:36 GMT -5
the number 23: 2 divided by 3 equals .666 the mark of the beast No. No it doesn't. This was many of the factors that turned me off the film. 2/3 = 0.666666666666666.... That's not a sinister number. If you want to round it to 3 digits, it's 0.667. The neighbour of the beast, perhaps, but not the number of the beast. |
|
sirgallahad2
Boomstick Coordinator
RUN!! Get to de CHOPPA!!!!!
Posts: 280
|
Post by sirgallahad2 on Feb 26, 2007 7:57:29 GMT -5
I stand corrected.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ellielator on Feb 26, 2007 11:18:43 GMT -5
I've only seen TV ads for this - and it looks terrible! Like it very well may be the worst movie of the year. I don't see how many movies could be as bad-looking as this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by StarOpal on Feb 26, 2007 11:33:17 GMT -5
To me, the commercials remind me of The Butterfly Effect. 'Nuff said.
But I'll probably end up renting it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ellielator on Feb 27, 2007 9:28:58 GMT -5
Actually, I didn't pay enough attention to think what movie I thought this was ripping off. Just the fact that it seemed to completely lack any real suspense or interesting plot / story. It looks like a perfect donkey just to appease the people who would prefer to see "noble" thrillers as opposed to something a little more horrific yet smarter and rewarding.
I don't know, but that sounds pretty close to the method behind the madness that is viewing those TV spots.
|
|
|
|
Post by PoolMan on Feb 27, 2007 17:26:50 GMT -5
If you want to round it to 3 digits, it's 0.667. The neighbour of the beast, perhaps, but not the number of the beast. "Hi The Beast! Can I borrow a cup of sugar?" |
|
|
|
Post by Ellielator on Mar 2, 2007 16:54:00 GMT -5
You know... maybe I'm trusting the advertising too much - is this movie funny? At all?
|
|
eatmyshorts
Ghostbuster
"Do you like-a-da Fat Boys?"
Posts: 536
|
Post by eatmyshorts on Mar 8, 2007 18:39:08 GMT -5
i kind of want to see it...but then again, not really.
|
|
eatmyshorts
Ghostbuster
"Do you like-a-da Fat Boys?"
Posts: 536
|
Post by eatmyshorts on Mar 8, 2007 18:39:34 GMT -5
^ worst post ever. sorry about that gang.
|
|
