To Sequel or Not to Sequel, that is the question

[DTH]

Greetinx

Just a quick note to mention that because Rich has managed to not only hire the aforementioned title once but in fact TWICE, he alone could be responsible for a sequel to this film.

As Rich stated in his review, they've probably got all the information re: his DVD-renting habits and pass this back to the film publishers.

You've seen all those 80's films with huge tape recorder-esque computers (best example is in Weird Science)? Well, there's a bunker somewhere under Hollywood filled with these and they measure the commercial success of every film ever released. If a film makes a certain amount of money, a green light goes on and a bad 50's B movie robot springs in to life and sets the wheels in to motion.

Because of Rich renting Kangaroo Jack TWICE, you just know that that Jerry Bruckheimer's Movie Hotline (its a bit like the Bat-phone only resulting in unnecessary sequels) has rung...

Best Regards

Dorian

[FiveMileSmile]

1.

I refuse to take any responsibility to the existence of terrible sequels. For instance, I just learned last nigth that they are making an Under Seige 3 set on an aeroplane, and I certainly didn't rent either Under Siege 1 or 2. Take your Orwellian witch-hunts elsewhere.

2.

The opinions of this poster are deeply suspect anyway. For those of you not in the know, this poster is the selfsame DTH who was responsible for my The Pit review, and my Spiderman review, and my upcoming Blood Beach review. Anything he says may or may not be completely fictitious or the result of some craaaayze dream he had. Handle with caution.

3.

Welcome to the forums, mate. Another Newbie sniped

- Rich
Newbie kill count - 2

[puggyd]

I just heard that "Sandlot 2: Son of the Beast" is starting production soon, with 4 or 5 more potential sequels if this one does good on direct to video.

Wow, that franchise could go on forever. For-ev-er. Foooooorrrrrr-eeeeevvvvvv-eeeeerrrrrr. Ffffffooooooorrrrrrr- eeeeeeeevvvvvvvvvvv-eeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrr.

[DTH]

FiveMileSmile said:

I refuse to take any responsibility to the existence of terrible sequels.

Your refusal is noted...somewhere....

Anything he says may or may not be completely fictitious or the result of some craaaayze dream he had. Handle with caution.

Hey! I proved that I wasn't dreaming. TWICE! Now all I have to do is find a tape with a copy of that advert (U.S. translation: commercial) that was sent back in time by Norwich Union and I'll be three for three!

I think you should review Hackers 2 and Hackers 3. That way, you can tell me all about them and I don't have to watch them ;D

Best Regards

Dorian