|
Post by bladestarr on Aug 30, 2003 11:38:52 GMT -5
I always love your reviews, they are very insightful and intelligent, as opposed to most online. However, Kyle made a slight mistake in the "Didja Notice?" section. He stated that the creature that appered in this movie as well as the first one was a goat. It was in fact a sheep, a symbol of the children of Elm Street themselves, blindly obeying and believing their parents. Freddy decided to be his own 'sheperd' if you will and cull the herd (down to nothing ). At several points throughout his history, Mr. Krueger has made it explicitly clear that the Elm street kids are 'all his children now', a declaration of him as a sheperd to the sheep. On a more positive note, while I am obviously a Krueger fan, I approved of Kyle's review of the film wholeheartedly! Keep up the good work guys!
|
|
|
Post by kylerexpop on Sept 8, 2003 0:33:20 GMT -5
thanks, boss! you're absolutely right! i guess that's what i get for dreaming about summer camps (and, apparently, getting killed there) instead of watching nightmare on elm streets. i will make sure that gets fixed as soon as possible, unless i forget, and even then something will be done. and i plan to watch all the nightmares and review them soon; justin's lone reviews are getting lonely! and this halloween, for certain this year, i'm buying a freddy glove. might as well, you know?
|
|
|
Post by Head Mutant on Sept 8, 2003 8:24:42 GMT -5
(Dryly) Yes, they need the warm, comforting, snuggly presence of you to keep them warm. Indeed. Harumph. Capital!
|
|