|
Post by zappakub on Jun 30, 2004 1:11:50 GMT -5
From your review I got the feeling that you liked this film yet you gave it a rewatchability of 1. Why?
And an interesting fact : Sharon Stone played Arnold's girlfriend in Total Recall
|
|
|
Post by Head Mutant on Jun 30, 2004 6:54:05 GMT -5
Because, as I mentioned, this film has its strengths and some notable watching points, but it's long, and it doesn't call out to be watched more than once every couple years. To me.
|
|
|
Post by Ms. Jellybean on Jun 30, 2004 8:07:37 GMT -5
I agree. We usually watch it only if it comes on TV over a holiday while we're at a relative's house. So I've only watched it once.
|
|
|
Post by Head Mutant on Jun 30, 2004 8:08:07 GMT -5
Remember, any of the categories on the mutant meter, including Rewatchability, are NOT indicators of how good or bad a film is. A movie can be really great, yet doesn't call for another viewing for a while (or ever) due to a number of factors. Schindler's List, great flick, but not one I watch every week. Conversely, I'm sure there are a few stinkers that might actually be worth popping in more frequently, if just to enjoy the bad silliness.
|
|
|
Post by PoolMan on Jun 30, 2004 11:37:48 GMT -5
That's always been one of the overriding unwritten laws of the MRFH... there's really no good way to numerically rate a movie with just one score. Rewatchability comes close, but as Justin points out, just because a movie is excellent doesn't mean you pull it out every day.
The OTHER extreme is CAP. With their revolutionary WISDOM system that anybody with a PhD in theoretical math and the help of Jesus himself can actually figure out.
|
|
|
Post by DocD83 on Jun 30, 2004 17:19:17 GMT -5
Jesus has a degree in theoretical math?
|
|
|
Post by Head Mutant on Jun 30, 2004 19:03:13 GMT -5
Of course. Why do you think there's a book of the Bible called Numbers?
|
|
|
Post by DocD83 on Jul 1, 2004 5:29:59 GMT -5
Well yeah, but that's in the beginning and there's nothing later. I thought he changed majors.
|
|