MRFHLine 5

Hucklebubba Moderator Since 1981--The industry leader in forming the head. Posts: 1,437	MRFHLine 5 Oct 5, 2004 16:34:51 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by Hucklebubba on Oct 5, 2004 16:34:51 GMT -5 Rich's response about fashion has a naughty word in it. Tee-hee! Actually, I'd kind of like a physical description of the object in question, and/or an explanation as to how one would go about wearing such a thing.
	But would you eat an animal. . ."figuratively"?

FiveMileSmile Moderator I guess that didn't fool anyone. Posts: 712	MRFHLine 5 Oct 6, 2004 3:05:47 GMT -5 Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by FiveMileSmile on Oct 6, 2004 3:05:47 GMT -5 Er. Yes. It seems it does, though it took me 3 re-reads to catch it. And I think you can safely assume it's a typo, rather than some new sewage-related fashion item. - Rich
	"Even after admitting this there is no catharsis, my punishment continues to elude me and I gain no deeper knowledge of myself; no new knowledge can be extracted from my telling. This confession has meant nothing."