Post by kylerexpop on Jul 22, 2006 3:54:31 GMT -5
usually, i barely read any mutant reviews, including my own. for one thing, i can't stand to read my own writing ever because all i see is crap. for another, i'm really, really busy.
but i seemed to remember that my 'the hills have eyes' review was particularly witty and insightful. so i got home from the sdcc and since i got up on a little bit of shut-eye while i drove home (yep, that's right, but don't do that yourself at home, kids!) i'm a bit wired so i'm surfing the internet. i saw my review got posted. i read it.
then i came across this passage:
"A desert that, as it so happens, was the sight of early domestic nuclear weapons tests, and is still undergoing governmental observance today (not a job you'd want, as the pre-title sequence illustrates)."
now i SWEAR that when i wrote my review i put "site" there. i can't imagine myself in any situation EVER where i would confuse "site" with "sight." what is going on? i blame microsoft word.
but if i did screw up, i'm sorry. i HATE reading anything, from magazines to cooking instructions to descriptions of nude scenes in movies, and seeing a blatant and easily-caught typo/misprint. i'd like to apologize to the rest of the staff, my parents, everyone who read that review and/or this post, Grant Morrison, Harold Bloom, William Shakespeare, and all other writers who have contributed to the writer i am.
i'm so angry and hurt and i don't know what to do. sorry, everyone.
i do stand by one thing: emilie de ravin is absolutely gorgeous. hooray!
but i seemed to remember that my 'the hills have eyes' review was particularly witty and insightful. so i got home from the sdcc and since i got up on a little bit of shut-eye while i drove home (yep, that's right, but don't do that yourself at home, kids!) i'm a bit wired so i'm surfing the internet. i saw my review got posted. i read it.
then i came across this passage:
"A desert that, as it so happens, was the sight of early domestic nuclear weapons tests, and is still undergoing governmental observance today (not a job you'd want, as the pre-title sequence illustrates)."
now i SWEAR that when i wrote my review i put "site" there. i can't imagine myself in any situation EVER where i would confuse "site" with "sight." what is going on? i blame microsoft word.
but if i did screw up, i'm sorry. i HATE reading anything, from magazines to cooking instructions to descriptions of nude scenes in movies, and seeing a blatant and easily-caught typo/misprint. i'd like to apologize to the rest of the staff, my parents, everyone who read that review and/or this post, Grant Morrison, Harold Bloom, William Shakespeare, and all other writers who have contributed to the writer i am.
i'm so angry and hurt and i don't know what to do. sorry, everyone.
i do stand by one thing: emilie de ravin is absolutely gorgeous. hooray!
